jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Analysis Ppt 75851 | Us20 Litwok


 148x       Filetype PPTX       File size 1.46 MB       Source: www.stata.com


File: Analysis Ppt 75851 | Us20 Litwok
outline motivation sensitivity analysis mhbounds matching methods refinements to mhbounds application final thoughts 2 sensitivity analysis nonexperimental approaches to estimating treatment effects balance observables to minimize potential for bias often ...

icon picture PPTX Filetype Power Point PPTX | Posted on 02 Sep 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
   Outline
   • Motivation
       – Sensitivity Analysis
       – mhbounds
       – Matching Methods
   • Refinements to mhbounds
   • Application
   • Final thoughts
                                                                        2
     Sensitivity Analysis
     •   Nonexperimental approaches to estimating treatment effects balance 
         observables to minimize potential for bias, often through matching or stratification
     •   Assumption needed for causal inference: conditional on observables the study is 
         free from hidden bias
     •   Rosenbaum (2002) recommends a sensitivity analysis for such approaches to 
         test this assumption
          – How are inferences altered by hidden biases of various magnitudes?
          – How large would hidden bias have to be to alter study conclusions?
     •   For an evaluation with a binary treatment and a binary outcome measure, 
         Rosenbaum (2002) calculates bounds based on the Mantel-Haenszel (1959) 
         statistic
                                                                                                               3
    Sensitivity Analysis
    •   Key parameter is  (the degree of departure from a study that is free of 
    •  
        hidden bias)
         Γ    Concept              Definition
         1    Good as Randomized   No hidden bias
         2    Positive Selection   For a pair of matched individuals, treated individual is twice as likely to 
                                   receive the treatment because of unobserved pretreatment differences 
                                   that are positively correlated with the outcome
    •   Sensitivity analysis returns treatment effect estimates for a range of values 
        of 
    •   Researcher assesses the strength of the evidence as the largest value of  
        for which there is no change to inference                                               4
   mhbounds
   •  mhbounds (Becker & Caliendo, 2007) implements sensitivity analysis 
      in Stata:
       – Calculates Rosenbaum bounds where both treatment and outcome 
         variables are binary using the Mantel-Haenszel statistic
                                                                        5
   mhbounds
   •  mhbounds (Becker & Caliendo, 2007) implements sensitivity analysis 
      in Stata:
       – Calculates Rosenbaum bounds where both treatment and outcome 
         variables are binary using the Mantel-Haenszel statistic
                                                     Adjusts the MH statistic 
                                                     downward for positive 
                                                     selection (e.g., those with 
                                                     better outcomes more likely 
                                                     to be treated)
                                                                        6
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Outline motivation sensitivity analysis mhbounds matching methods refinements to application final thoughts nonexperimental approaches estimating treatment effects balance observables minimize potential for bias often through or stratification assumption needed causal inference conditional on the study is free from hidden rosenbaum recommends a such test this how are inferences altered by biases of various magnitudes large would have be alter conclusions an evaluation with binary and outcome measure calculates bounds based mantel haenszel statistic key parameter degree departure that concept definition good as randomized no positive selection pair matched individuals treated individual twice likely receive because unobserved pretreatment differences positively correlated returns effect estimates range values researcher assesses strength evidence largest value which there change becker caliendo implements in stata where both variables using adjusts mh downward e g those better outcomes ...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.