252x Filetype PDF File size 0.39 MB Source: www.econstor.eu
Ali, Asghar
Working Paper
A conceptual framework for environmental justice
based on shared but differentiated responsibilities
CSERGE Working Paper EDM, No. 01-02
Provided in Cooperation with:
The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE),
University of East Anglia
Suggested Citation: Ali, Asghar (2001) : A conceptual framework for environmental justice
based on shared but differentiated responsibilities, CSERGE Working Paper EDM, No.
01-02, University of East Anglia, The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global
Environment (CSERGE), Norwich
This Version is available at:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/80259
Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use:
Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your
Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes.
Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial
Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them
machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise
use the documents in public.
Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen
(insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open
gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you
genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated
licence.
A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
BASED ON SHARED BUT
DIFFERENTIATED RESPONSIBILITIES
by
Asghar Ali
CSERGE Working Paper EDM 01-02
A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
BASED ON SHARED BUT
DIFFERENTIATED RESPONSIBILITIES
by
Asghar Ali
School of Environmental Sciences
and
The Centre for Social and Economic Research
on the Global Environment
University of East Anglia
Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk UK
telephone: (44)(0)1603 592542:
email - Asghar.Ali@uea.ac.uk
Acknowledgements
The support of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is gratefully
acknowledged. This work was part of the interdisciplinary research programme of the ESRC
Research Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE).
The author wishes to thank Tim O'Riordan for his support and comments on an earlier
version of this paper.
ISSN 0967-8875
Abstract
Environmental justice has become a major issue in the discourses of
environment. The calls for environmental equity and justice are now part of
major environmental negotiations like the UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol, to
give some examples. In this paper I locate the issues of environmental justice
within the broader framework of environmental sustainability and the
contemporary debates about theories of justice. The environmental justice
movement in the USA, which has gained popular momentum in recent years, is
briefly studied. This particular grassroots movement appears to be redefining
the sustainability agenda with a strong social justice content. It has similarities
with environmentally informed social justice movements in the developing
world, the so- called ‘environmentalism of the poor’. Employing a critical
discursive methodology I briefly and critically review some of the well-known
theories of justice based on different principles of justice like need, desert and
entitlement. These are looked at within the contemporary debates of
universalism versus particularism or the ‘abstract’ liberal versus communitarian
theories and some other critical perspectives on justice. I argue for a broader
conception of environmental justice that takes into account particularities but is
also sensitive to the global nature of many of the environmental problems that
are spread and have impacts across regions, territories and even countries. In
such situations it becomes necessary as a matter of justice to take into account
differentiated impacts arising out of disproportionate contributions to
environmental harms or ‘bads’. I further argue that a theory of justice, which
will recognize this fact, will also have to consider differentiated responsibilities.
Key words: Sustainability, sustainable development, equity, justice, distributive
justice, vulnerabilities, responsibility.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.