Authentication
352x Tipe PDF Ukuran file 0.59 MB Source: 2010
Chapter 2. Development of a National REDD-plus System in
Indonesia
Henry Scheyvens and Agus Setyarso1
Note: This chapter is extracted from the forthcoming IGES report “Developing National REDD-
plus Systems: Progress, Challenges and Ways Forward”.
Introduction
REDD-plus (reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, conservation of
forest carbon stocks, sustainable management of forest, and enhancement of forest carbon
stocks), a concept absent from Indonesia’s Forestry Long Term Development Plan 2006-2025,
has in the short space of a few years become a priority not only for the forestry sector but for
Indonesia’s national climate change strategy. This reflects the immense volume of greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions associated with forest destruction in Indonesia, the relatively low
abatement costs that the forestry sector is thought to offer, and the expectation that REDD-
plus could generate large financial inflows. The potential for tree planting to increase the
nation’s carbon sequestration capacity and the potential co-benefits of REDD-plus, such as bio-
diversity conservation, are also reasons for why the concept has attracted so much attention.
Mitigation and adaption to climate change are now listed as one of the Ministry of Forestry’s
eight priorities for the forestry sector for 2010-2014.
Box 1. Forestry sector priorities, 2010-2014
1. Strengthening forest designation to secure forest areas
2. Rehabilitation of degraded forest and [improving carrying capacity of]
watershed
3. Forest protection and fire management
4. Conservation of biological diversity
5. Revitalisation of forest utilisation and forest industries
6. Empowerment of indigenous peoples and local communities
7. Mitigation and adaptation to climate change
8. Strengthening forest institutions
Source: Siswanto (2010).
1
Dr. Henry Scheyvens serves as the Director of the Natural Resources Management Group at the Institute for
Global Environmental Strategies (Japan). Dr. Agus Setyarso is based at the National Forestry Council of Indonesia as
the Commissioner on Forest and Economic issues.
The total forested area in Indonesia is estimated to be 137.09 million ha2 covering
approximately 70% of the country (MoFor 2008). Indonesia has the world’s third largest area of
tropical forest and the most species-rich forests in Asia (World Bank 2006). Forestry has
contributed 3 – 4% of gross domestic product over the past ten years (ibid.) and about 120
million people have been defined as forest-dependent (Ginting 2000 in Down to Earth 2002).
However, Indonesia’s forest resources are not contributing as they should to poverty reduction,
economic and social development, and environmental sustainability. Forests are threatened
with degradation, fragmentation and destruction, and a quarter of the state forest area has no
tree cover (Contreras-Hermosilla and Fay 2005). Indonesia continues to experience high annual
rates of forest loss (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Deforestation rate, 2000-2005 (ha/yr)
2500000
2000000
1500000
1000000
500000
0
2000-2001 2001 -20022002 -20032003 -20042004 -2005
Source: MoFor (2008).
Forest management issues are likely to received greater attention now that President Susilo
Bambang Yudhoyono has made climate change mitigation and adaptation national priorities for
Indonesia. Indonesia was one of the 26 countries to sign the Copenhagen accord in December
2009, and in doing so committed itself to submitting an emissions reduction target to the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) by 31 January 2010. It has
set targets of 26% of emissions reductions by 2020, and 41% with international support. In its
submission, the Government of Indonesia (GOI) explained that these targets would be achieved
through Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMA) on seven issues/sectors –
deforestation, peat land, sustainable energy sources, energy efficiency, public transport and
waste management – though it expects the major contribution to come from the forest sector
(including peat lands), with land use change, forestry and peat fires understood to be
2
This figure includes marine conservation reserves. The terrestrial forest area is 133.7 million ha (MoFor 2008).
responsible for over half of the national GHG emissions (Fig. 2). Of the 0.767 giga tons (Gt) of
GHG emissions reductions that it estimates as necessary to achieve the 26% target, through the
Second National Communication the GOI explains that it expects forestry to provide 0.392 Gt,
or about 51% of the total, and peat lands to contribute 0.280 Gt, or about 36.5% of the total.
The new Minister of Forestry, Zulkifli Hasan, who assumed his position on October 2009, has
assigned a special think tank team composed of eight experts to advise on actions to contribute
to the national 26% emissions reduction target, amongst other issues.
Indonesia has been active in the international negotiations on REDD-plus and has been
described as an “epicentre” for REDD-plus activities. In 2009, the GOI confirmed its
participation in two international initiatives to support REDD-plus readiness activities: the
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) managed by World Bank and the UN-REDD Program.
At the national level, various activities are underway to formulate a REDD-plus strategy, a
number of departments have taken up the issue of REDD-plus, a legal framework to regulate
REDD-plus has been established, and work on a national reference emission level and on
establishing a system to monitor GHG removals and emissions from forests is under way. At the
sub-national level, several provincial governors are strong supporters of the REDD-plus concept
and have issued decrees, established working groups, and encouraged the involvement of
external actors to promote REDD-plus activities. REDD-plus demonstration activities and
projects3 are either in the design phase or at early implementation stages across much of
Indonesia. International support for Indonesia’s readiness and demonstration activities is strong
(see Appendix).
Figure 2. National GHG emissions for year 2000, Indonesia (CO2e)
1400000
1200000
Energy
1000000
800000 Industry
Gg 600000 Agriculture
400000 Waste
200000 LUCF
0 Peat Fire
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Source: Indonesia Second National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change (UNFCCC): Summary for Policy Makers. Nov. 2009. Note: No figures for LUCF for 2005.
3
We make a distinction between “demonstration activities” (REDD-plus projects formally endorsed by the Ministry
of Forestry as demonstration activities) and REDD-plus “projects” (projects not formally endorsed as
demonstration activities).
This paper focuses on the development of the national REDD-plus system in Indonesia. It
describes and analyses the progress that has been made on various aspects of this system and
some of the outstanding challenges that must be met for Indonesia to be able to claim that it is
achieving real, long-term emissions reductions and carbon stock enhancement in the forest
sector. This paper covers the development of the REDD-plus strategy, REDD-plus organisations
and institutions, reference emission level, architecture for monitoring/accounting, reporting
and verification, and REDD-plus payment and payment distribution. The objective of this paper
is to provide a comprehensive yet succinct description of the development of the national
REDD-plus system, as well as the challenges it faces, and to identify critical issues that now
require attention. A limitation of this paper is that REDD-plus activities in Indonesia are now so
varied and numerous, taking place at both national and sub-national levels, that not all can be
described in detail.
The information analysed in this paper was gathered through a literature review and through
interviews with officials, both at national and sub-national levels, representatives of non-
governmental organisations (NGOs), and other forest stakeholders in Indonesia conducted by
the authors during the course of their work.
For readers not familiar with the international negotiations on REDD-plus, attention should be
drawn to the fact that the negotiations on “REDD” have been expanded to “REDD-plus” and this
expanded concept is supported by the GOI. This paper uses both terms – REDD and REDD-plus –
according to how the activities that are reviewed were/are intended.
REDD-plus strategy
This section describes the evolution of Indonesia’s REDD-plus strategy and identifies some of
the challenges that must be met. Recent scenario analysis, which can contribute to the
development of a national REDD-plus strategy by identifying the relative importance of policy
interventions in terms of mitigation potential and abatement costs, is also reviewed.
Reflecting its mandate to govern the nation’s state forest lands, the Ministry of Forestry (MoFor)
has the main responsibility for developing the national REDD-plus strategy in Indonesia. In 2007,
MoFor developed the concept of REDDI (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest
Degradation in Indonesia) and, at a parallel event at the 13th Convention of the Parties (COP) to
the UNFCCC in December of the same year, officially launched Indonesia’s REDD (now REDD-
plus) roadmap, which includes readiness and transition (capacity building, demonstration
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.