jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Sample Contract For Construction 84509 | 9780230230446 Sample


 180x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.09 MB       Source: www.macmillanihe.com


File: Sample Contract For Construction 84509 | 9780230230446 Sample
adriaanse 9780230521650 02 cha01 adriaanse 9780230521650 02 cha01 qxd 15 04 2010 17 25 page 1 this file is to be used only for a purpose specified by palgrave macmillan ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 13 Sep 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
      Adriaanse_9780230521650_02_cha01:Adriaanse_9780230521650_02_cha01.qxd  15/04/2010  17:25  Page 1
       This file is to be used only for a purpose specified by Palgrave Macmillan, such as checking proofs, preparing an
       index, reviewing, endorsing or planning coursework/other institutional needs. You may store and print the file and
       share it with others helping you with the specified purpose, but under no circumstances may the file be distributed
       or otherwise made accessible to any other third parties without the express prior permission of Palgrave Macmillan.
       Please contact rights@palgrave.com if you have any queries regarding use of the file.
                  1         The Nature of Construction
                            Contracts
               A variety of factors make a construction contract different from most other types
               of contracts. These include the length of the project, its complexity, its size and
               the fact that the price agreed and the amount of work done may change as it 
               proceeds. As a result, the allocation of these risks is a very important part of the
               contract since these factors always result in additional costs being incurred. This
               inevitably raises the question of who should pay.
               Complex nature
               The structure may be a new building on virgin ground. It may involve the demo-
               lition of an existing building and its full reconstruction. It could involve partial
               demolition and rebuilding, or the refurbishment and extension of an existing build-
               ing or structure. This may be mostly below ground (in which case it is engineer-
               ing) or above ground (in which case it is building). Building, however, includes
               foundations and other underground works. A building contract can consist of
               activities and services carried out both above and below ground level.
                 The term ‘construction contract’ or ‘construction law’ is used throughout this
               book. The term includes contracts for building works and as well as engineering
               contracts. Chitty on Contracts introduced for the first time in 1999 a chapter on
               the subject in its 28th edition (see ch. 37). Architects traditionally design and
               administer building contracts. The Architects Registration Board (ARB, see
               www.arb.org.uk) now regulates their academic and practical training. Consulting
               civil engineers design civil engineering works and administer their construction.
               A large engineering contract will usually make provision for administration and
               supervision by site-based resident engineers.Modern contracts also provide for
               the appointment of project managers to coordinate and administer the contract.
               What is a construction contract?
               In Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd v. Gilbert-Ash Northern [1974] AC 689,
               Lord Diplock at 717B described a building contract as:
                  ‘an entire contract for the sale of goods and work and labour for a lump sum
                  price payable by instalments as the goods are delivered and the work done. Deci-
                  sions have to be made from time to time about such essential matters as the
                  making of variation orders, the expenditure of provisional and prime cost sums
                  and extension of time for the carrying out of the work under the contract.’
               It is important to realise that Lord Diplock was referring to a contract made
               using a standard form of building contract. Such contracts usually make provi-
               sion for interim payments at regular intervals as the work proceeds, whereas a
               contract that is described as entire is a product of the common law. It may
                                                                      1
     Adriaanse_9780230521650_02_cha01:Adriaanse_9780230521650_02_cha01.qxd  15/04/2010  17:25  Page 2
                                            PROOF
       2  Construction Contract Law
          make provision for stage payments, but in essence, it requires the contractor to 
          complete all its work before any entitlement to payment arises. A modern
          example of such an entire contract is Discain Project Services Ltd v. Opecprime
          Developments Ltd [2001] EWHC Technology 450. The carrying out and
          completion of this contract (whether made using a standard form contract or
          entire) differs from other manufacturing processes. HHJ Newey OR in Emson
          Eastern v. EME Developments (1991) 55 BLR 114 described the differences at
          p. 125, within the context of practical completion of the work:
            ‘I think the most important background fact which I should keep in mind
            is that building construction is not like the manufacture of goods in a
            factory. The size of the project, site conditions, the use of many materials
            and the employment of various kinds of operatives make it virtually impos-
            sible to achieve the same degree of perfection that a manufacturer can. It
            must be a rare new building in which every screw and every brush of paint
            is absolutely correct.’
          There is no special body of rules that applies to such contracts, whether they are
          described as building, engineering or construction contracts. Lord Reid said in
          Modern Engineering that where the parties enter into detailed building contracts
          there were ‘no overriding rules or principles covering their contractual relation-
          ships beyond those which generally apply’. This principle was supported by Lord
          Lloyd of Berwick in Beaufort Developments (NI) Ltd v. Gilbert-Ash (NI) Ltd
          [1998] UKHL [1988] 1 AC 191 where he stated that:
            ‘Standard forms of building contracts have often been criticised by the
            courts for being unnecessary obscure and verbose. But in fairness one
            should add that it is sometimes the courts themselves who have added to
            the difficulty by treating building contracts as if they were subject to
            special rules of their own.’
          The fact that the ordinary rules of the law of contract apply is subject to an impor-
          tant qualification. Legislation passed following the recommendations of the
          Latham Report (Constructing the Team, 1994) has treated construction contracts as
          a special category requiring statutory intervention. The introduction of Housing
          Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, part II (hereafter HGCRA 96)
          has also altered fundamentally the allocation of risks in construction contracts. All
          parties before entering into contracts have to consider how they will deal with the
          legislation. It also provides a much wider definition of what, for the purposes of
          the legislation, is a construction contract.
           Section 104(1) of the HGCRA 96 states that a ‘construction contract’ includes:
          • the carrying out of construction operations
          • arranging for the carrying out of construction operations by others, whether
            under a subcontract to him or otherwise
          • providing his own labour, or the labour of others, for carrying out con-
            struction operations.
          Section 104(2) extends the definition of a construction contract to any agree-
         Adriaanse_9780230521650_02_cha01:Adriaanse_9780230521650_02_cha01.qxd  15/04/2010  17:25  Page 3
                       PROOF
                                                                     The nature of construction contracts      3
                      ment to carry out architectural, design or surveying work, or the provision of
                      advice on building, engineering, interior or exterior decoration, or the laying
                      out of landscape. Note that a contract of employment is specifically excluded
                      from the statutory definition. This definition is much wider than that given by
                      Lord Diplock above. It includes the carrying out of design activities and the
                      giving of advice, so widening the range of activities covered by the legislation.
                      Construction operations are further defined by Section 105 as including:
                      • all normal building and civil engineering works, including operations such
                          as scaffolding, site clearance and painting and decorating as well as
                          contracts for repair and maintenance
                      • consultants agreements on construction operations
                      • labour-only contracts
                      •   contracts of any value.
                      Certain contracts are excluded from the operation of the Act: see Section
                      105(2). The reason for this is that they did not suffer from the same ills iden-
                      tified by the Latham Report. The petrochemical and process industries are
                      excluded, and so are contracts concerning the supply and fixing of plant
                      (including supporting steelwork). These activities are not classified as
                      ‘construction operations’. The off-site manufacture of components to be
                      incorporated into the construction work is also excluded, and so are contracts
                      with residential occupiers (see Section 106). There is however, a substantial
                      body of case law resulting from contracts with residential occupiers. These
                      involve either the use of standard forms of contracts or other contracts that
                      make specific provision for adjudication. This is discussed further in Chapter
                      16. In a number of cases the meaning of construction operations has been
                      considered. Homer Burgess Ltd v. Chirex (Annan) [2000] BLR 124 held that
                      pipework was part of a pharmaceutical plant and not a construction operation.
                      By contrast, in Palmer Ltd v. ABB Power Construction (1999) BLR 426 the
                      subcontractor work was held to come into the definition. This was so despite
                      the main contract work being outside the definition. Staveley Industries Plc v.
                      Odebrecht Oil & Gas Services (2001) 98 (10) LSG 46 held that structures on
                      the sea bed below low water mark are not part of the United Kingdom for the
                      application of the Act.
                         Under the Act there was a special requirement that the contract has to be in
                      writing. ‘Writing’ was widely defined by Section 107, so word of mouth agree-
                      ments referring to a written document or an exchange of letters are sufficient to
                      bring a contract into the section. Whether the agreement is in writing has been
                      anissue in many references to adjudication. In Grovedeck Ltd v. Capital
                      Demolition Ltd [2000] BLR 181 an oral agreement was entered into. The parties 
                      went to adjudication under the Scheme for Construction Contracts despite the
                      protests of one side that the Act did not apply. HHJ Bowsher QC refused 
                      to enforce the adjudicator’s award, finding that there was no written contract.
                      The Court of Appeal in RJT Consulting Engineers Ltd v. DM Engineering
                      (Northern Ireland) Ltd (2002) EWCA Civ 270 had to consider the meaning of
                      Section 107. All three judges interpreted the section as requiring the express
                      terms of the agreement to be in writing, not the agreement itself. (See Chapter
                      16, where the issue of writing is discussed further in relation to 
          Adriaanse_9780230521650_02_cha01:Adriaanse_9780230521650_02_cha01.qxd  15/04/2010  17:25  Page 4
                                                                                                     PROOF
                4      Construction Contract Law
                      adjudication.) As a result of this decision many contracts was considered to be
                      excluded from the legislation. After consultation with industry, new legislation
                      has been passed but not implemented yet: The Local Democracy, Economic
                      Development and Construction Act 2009 (LDEDC 09). Part 8 deals with
                      Construction Contracts. Clause 139 (1) repeals Section 107. This means that all
                      contracts whether made orally or in writing are now subject to the Act. However,
                      Section 139(2) requires the adjudication agreement to be in writing. When
                      implemented, these changes  will only affect contracts entered into after that
                      date, so for some time two sets of rules will apply. Note also that private finance
                      initiative contracts and finance agreements are excluded from the legislation on
                      grounds of policy.
                      Risk allocation
                      Like all contracts, construction contracts are about the prior allocation of risk.
                      Windward (1992) draws attention to the construction industry’s need to make
                      a profit on the employment of capital:
                            ‘If risk is an essential ingredient of the system which generates your profit,
                            it is inevitable that there must be a structure for resolving disputes. It brings
                            the relationship of the disputants back into balance so that life can resume
                            its normal course.’
                      Windward’s reference was primarily to arbitration, the main method of dispute
                      resolution prior to the introduction of adjudication. It is of course a matter of
                      debate whether the introduction of statutory adjudication by the HGCRA 96
                      achieves that balance between disputing parties. It was conceived by the Latham
                      Report as essentially a ‘quick fix’ in that it was intended to resolve disputes as they
                      arose rather than at the end of the project, this being the usual practice before its
                      introduction. Standard forms of contract try to allocate risk equitably between the
                      parties. In essence, the payment provisions of the HGCRA 96 can also be described
                      as an attempt to introduce a measure of equity into the contractual relationship
                      between contractor and subcontractor. Risks are varied in construction contracts,
                      and include many factors that can affect the progress of the work.
                      1    The unforeseen:
                           (a) unexpected ground conditions
                           (b) unpredicted weather conditions
                           (c) a shortage of material
                           (d) a shortage of skilled labour
                           (e) accidents, whether by fire, flood or carelessness
                           (f)  innovative design that does not work or proves impossible to construct.
                      2    The length of the contract. Projects vary in the time needed for completion,
                           from days to years. During that time the risk allocation agreed at the time of
                           contracting can change substantially. This is especially so with regard to the
                           availability of materials and its costs. A contractor may have ‘bought’ the job
                           because work was scarce at the time and the price of components low.
                      3    The number of participants, and parties in the project and the corresponding
                           length of contractual chain cause their own problems. The risk of insolvency
                           increases the longer the chain.
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Adriaanse cha qxd page this file is to be used only for a purpose specified by palgrave macmillan such as checking proofs preparing an index reviewing endorsing or planning coursework other institutional needs you may store and print the share it with others helping but under no circumstances distributed otherwise made accessible any third parties without express prior permission of please contact rights com if have queries regarding use nature construction contracts variety factors make contract different from most types these include length project its complexity size fact that price agreed amount work done change proceeds result allocation risks very important part since always in additional costs being incurred inevitably raises question who should pay complex structure new building on virgin ground involve demo lition existing full reconstruction could partial demolition rebuilding refurbishment extension build ing mostly below which case engineer above however includes foundation...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.