109x Filetype PPT File size 0.16 MB Source: digitalpreservation.gov
Question 2 • 2. What hardware technology are you least concerned about for preservation archives in terms of reliability of the bits, and why. > Tape > Most of the digital archive data is on tape -> good track record. > There are still some customers with 3420s and 4480s out there, technology 20- 30 yrs old > Many independent studies done to predict archive life – 10 - 100 years – Manufacturers typically recommend 30 years maximum – Possible failure mechanisms ● Particle corrosion ● Binder and substrate aging ● Magnetic thermal stability > Consider technology refresh every 8 to11 years due to equipment obsolescence – Tape has high data rate for more efficient media conversion to next technology – Virtual tape solutions can help in migration to new technologies 2 Question 3 • 3. What hardware technology being developed in 1, 2, or 5 years would either increase or reduce the concern about the reliability of the bits (defined as: the bits "in" will be the same as the bits "out") and why. > Holographic storage would increase the concern about data archive reliability because it is new and unknown. – Difficult technical problems -> Long 40 year development history with no major commercial products yet. – Promising archive life but no field history on media archival reliability, so real failure mechanisms are unknown. – Is roadmap compelling enough when compared to current archive technologies? Will it really become mainstream or just niche market? 3 Discussion Topics • 1. What hardware standards and/or hardware technologies can now apply (and will apply in the near future) to digital preservation in terms of: Magnetic Tape > a. Costs of long-term storage, including media and facilities Tape Media is lowest cost GB technology suitable for archive. Need to include floor space and environmental control costs for long term storage. > b. Reliabilty of media and other components Long history of reliable use > c. Migration to new technologies Fast data rate for more efficent migration > d. Security Encryption available • 2. What hardware technologies if any have the potential in the 2012 timeframe to change current methods and techniques of digital preservation? Unknown • 3. What is the one thing that would be most useful to get from software that could support the items in Topic #1? Background migration to newer technologies every 8-11 years 4 Access vs Power /CO2 Access Time and Energy (1PByte of Data for 1yr) 1,000,000 100,000 10,000 1,000 100 10 Access Time to Data (Sec) 1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 Energy Needed for Storage (lbs ofCO 2) 5 What about throughput? Storage System Power Efficiency - Tape Library, MAID, RAID 1400 1200 GOODNESS 1000 TAPE SYSTEMS 800 600 400 CAPACITY (TB/KW) 200 DISK SYSTEMS 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 THROUGHPUT (TB/HR/KW) 6
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.