jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Technology Ppt 70194 | Raymond Sun2007


 109x       Filetype PPT       File size 0.16 MB       Source: digitalpreservation.gov


File: Technology Ppt 70194 | Raymond Sun2007
question 2 2 what hardware technology are you least concerned about for preservation archives in terms of reliability of the bits and why tape most of the digital archive data ...

icon picture PPT Filetype Power Point PPT | Posted on 29 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
         Question 2
           • 2. What hardware technology are you least concerned 
               about for preservation archives in terms of reliability of 
               the bits, and why.
                > Tape
                      > Most of the digital archive data is on tape -> good track record. 
                      > There are still some customers with 3420s and 4480s out there, technology 20- 30 yrs 
                          old 
                      > Many independent studies done to predict archive life
                                –  10 - 100 years
                                –  Manufacturers typically  recommend 30 years maximum
                                –  Possible failure mechanisms 
                                       ●  Particle corrosion
                                       ●  Binder and substrate aging
                                       ●  Magnetic thermal stability
                      > Consider technology refresh  every 8 to11 years due to equipment obsolescence
                                –  Tape has high data rate for more efficient media conversion to next  technology 
                                –  Virtual tape solutions can help in migration to new technologies
                                                                                                                           2
     Question 3
     • 3. What hardware technology being developed in 1, 2, or 5 
       years would either increase or reduce the concern about the 
       reliability of the bits (defined as: the bits "in" will be the same 
       as the bits "out") and why.
           > Holographic storage would increase the concern about data archive 
             reliability because it is new and unknown.
                 – Difficult technical problems -> Long 40 year development history with no 
                  major commercial products yet. 
                 – Promising archive life but no field history on media archival reliability, so 
                  real failure mechanisms are unknown.
                 – Is roadmap compelling enough when compared to current archive 
                  technologies? Will it really become mainstream or just niche market? 
                                                                    3
       Discussion Topics
        •  1.  What hardware standards and/or hardware technologies can 
           now apply (and will apply in the near future) to digital preservation 
           in terms of: Magnetic Tape
            > a. Costs of long-term storage, including media and facilities Tape Media 
               is lowest cost GB technology suitable for archive. Need to include floor 
               space and environmental control costs for long term storage. 
            > b. Reliabilty of media and other components Long history of reliable use 
            > c. Migration to new technologies Fast data rate for more efficent 
               migration
            > d. Security Encryption available 
        •  2. What hardware technologies if any have the potential in the 2012 
           timeframe to change current methods and techniques of digital 
           preservation? Unknown
        •  3. What is the one thing that would be most useful to get from 
           software that could support the items in Topic #1? Background 
           migration to newer technologies every 8-11 years
                                                                                           4
       Access vs Power /CO2
                     Access Time and Energy (1PByte of Data for 1yr)
             1,000,000
               100,000
                10,000
                  1,000
                   100
                    10
             Access Time to Data (Sec)
                      1
                        1         10         100       1,000     10,000    100,000   1,000,000
                                 Energy Needed for Storage (lbs ofCO 2)
                                                                                              5
     What about throughput?
            Storage System Power Efficiency - Tape Library, MAID, RAID
        1400
        1200                                 GOODNESS
        1000
                                        TAPE SYSTEMS
        800
        600
        400
      CAPACITY  (TB/KW)
        200
                           DISK SYSTEMS
          0
           0     1     2    3     4    5     6     7    8
                         THROUGHPUT  (TB/HR/KW)
                                                             6
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Question what hardware technology are you least concerned about for preservation archives in terms of reliability the bits and why tape most digital archive data is on good track record there still some customers with s out yrs old many independent studies done to predict life years manufacturers typically recommend maximum possible failure mechanisms particle corrosion binder substrate aging magnetic thermal stability consider refresh every due equipment obsolescence has high rate more efficient media conversion next virtual solutions can help migration new technologies being developed or would either increase reduce concern defined as will be same holographic storage because it unknown difficult technical problems long year development history no major commercial products yet promising but field archival so real roadmap compelling enough when compared current really become mainstream just niche market discussion topics standards now apply near future a costs term including facilities...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.