jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Research Pdf 52523 | Sample Format For Reviewing  Journal Article


 177x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.20 MB       Source: medicine.wright.edu


File: Research Pdf 52523 | Sample Format For Reviewing Journal Article
sample format for reviewing a journal article reading and summarizing a research article in the behavioral or medical sciences can be overwhelming below is a simple model to guide students ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 20 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
                                                Sample Format For Reviewing A Journal Article 
                   
                   
                  Reading and summarizing a research article in the behavioral or medical sciences can be overwhelming.  
                  Below is a simple model to guide students through this process.  
                    
                      Authors’ last names (year) conducted a study about ________________________.  The 
                      participants were/the setting was ___________________________.  (New paragraph) The findings 
                      were _____________________________.  Discussion. (Possibly a new paragraph) The authors 
                      suggested _____________________. Discussion. 
                                                                                                                                       
                      Students should fill in the blanks with their own words.  To copy directly from the article fails to show 
                      comprehension and may also be considered plagiarism. 
                   
                   
                   
                  To “fill in the blanks”, a student should read the journal article and pay specific attention to: 
                   
                  Sentence #1- Authors’ last names (year) conducted a study about _________________. 
                          Read the Abstract; this will give an overview of the study’s (article’s) purpose. 
                          Read the entire article without trying to summarize it. 
                          Go back and read the Literature Review or Background section of the article. Toward the end of 
                           the section, the authors should identify gaps in the existing literature and tell the reader how the 
                           current study will fill that gap. The authors will also state their hypothesis (purpose) at the end of 
                           this section.  
                   
                  Section #2 - The participants were/the setting was ___________________________. 
                          Read the Methods section of the paper. In this section, the authors will describe how the data was 
                           collected, who was included in the sample, and any instruments used. 
                          A reader might want to consider sample size, demographic characteristics, or any interesting 
                           protocol. 
                          It is not necessary to report every fact (i.e., 35% of the participants were male, 71% identified 
                           their race as Asian).     
                   
                  Section #3 - The findings were _____________________________. 
                          Read the Findings section of the article. 
                          Some statistics may be confusing. Pay attention to key words such as “increased”, “decreased”, 
                           “improved”, and “reduced”. 
                          “No change” may also be considered a significant finding. 
                          Next, read the Discussion section. The authors will present the findings in general terms. 
                   
                  Section #4 - The authors suggested _____________________. 
                          Read the Discussion section and look for comments that the authors made about the intervention 
                           or program such as “Did it work?” or “Should it be continued?”. 
                          Look for the author’s critique of why the study did or did not produce results. Did anything 
                           unexpected influence the findings? 
                          The author may suggest a future line of research or “next steps” to improve the body of 
                           knowledge. 
                   
                  Sample format, Page 1 of 2 
                  Additional Considerations: 
                          A literature review is a summary of what research has been completed in a topic area; it should be 
                           summarized in your own words. 
                          Read the entire article first and then go back and take notes. Jot down notes in your own words. 
                           This increases comprehension as well as decreases the likelihood of plagiarism.  
                          The review is written in third person; no “I” or “you”. 
                          Unless stated otherwise, a literature review ideally reflects articles published in the last five to ten 
                           years. 
                          Not every detail or fact needs to be reported. A reader will obtain a copy of the article if more 
                           information is needed. 
                          Write the literature review in the past tense; the research has already been completed. 
                          The article cannot “do”, “find”, or “say” anything. The authors are the people who conducted the 
                           study. 
                          The above format is a guideline. It may be necessary to change the verbs or to expand an idea. 
                   
                  Sample format, Page 2 of 2 
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Sample format for reviewing a journal article reading and summarizing research in the behavioral or medical sciences can be overwhelming below is simple model to guide students through this process authors last names year conducted study about participants were setting was new paragraph findings discussion possibly suggested should fill blanks with their own words copy directly from fails show comprehension may also considered plagiarism student read pay specific attention sentence abstract will give an overview of s purpose entire without trying summarize it go back literature review background section toward end identify gaps existing tell reader how current that gap state hypothesis at methods paper describe data collected who included any instruments used might want consider size demographic characteristics interesting protocol not necessary report every fact i e male identified race as asian some statistics confusing key such increased decreased improved reduced no change signific...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.