Filetype PDF | Posted on 19 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Authentication
digital resources
170x Filetype PDF File size 0.61 MB Source: publicpartnershipdata.azureedge.net
Annex 1: ProEcoServ Project Document
PROJECT DOCUMENT
SECTION 1: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
1.1 Project title: Project for Ecosystem Services (ProEcoServ)
1.2 Project number: GFL/
PMS:
1.3 Project type: FSP
1.4 Trust Fund: GEF
1.5 Strategic objectives:
GEF strategic long-term objective: BD2
Strategic programme for GEF IV: BD-SP4 BD-SP5
1.6 UNEP priority: Ecosystem management
1.7 Geographical scope: Global multi-country Chile, Trinidad & Tobago,
South Africa/Lesotho, Viet Nam
1.8 Mode of execution: Internal
1.9 Project executing organisation: UNEP-DEPI; (CEAZA, Chile; CSIR, South Africa
and Lesotho; UWI, Trinidad and Tobago; ISPONRE, Viet Nam)
1.10 Duration of project: 48 months
Commencing:
Completion:
1.11 Cost of project
US$ %
Cost to the GEF Trust Fund 6,296,637 24.3
Co-financing 19,620,551 75.7
Cash
CSIR, South Africa 1,000,000 3.9
TCF, Trinidad and Tobago 150,000 0.6
Government of Viet Nam 426,250 1.6
RCFEE, Viet Nam 80,000 0.3
Sub-total 1,656,250 6.4
In-kind
CONAMA, Chile 92,237 0.4
CONAF, Chile 80,000 0.3
DGA, Chile 80,000 0.3
SAG, Chile 80,000 0.3
Sernatur, Chile 80,000 0.3
CEAZA, Chile 400,000 1.5
UDP, Chile 50,000 0.2
Aquacons., Chile 80,000 0.3
Escondida, Chile 100,000 0.4
SQM, Chile 100,000 0.4
IEB, Chile 274,285 1.1
CSIR, South Africa 800,000 3.1
SANBI, South Africa 70,000 0.3
UWI, Trinidad and Tobago 489,915 1.9
TCF, Trinidad and Tobago 144,500 0.6
The Green Fund (GF), Trinidad and Tobago 10,828,674 41.8
ISPONRE, Vietnam 300,000 1.2
PPG, Vietnam 200,000 0.8
RCFEE, Viet Nam 300,000 1.2
1
Annex 1: ProEcoServ Project Document
IOG, Vietnam 200,000 0.8
IUCN, Vietnam 300,000 1.2
UNPEI 25,000 0.1
NCP 45,000 0.2
UNU 80,000 0.3
UNEP 2,764,690 10.7
Sub-total 17,964,301 69.3
Project Total 25,917,188 100.0
1.12 Project summary
The Project for Ecosystem Services (ProEcoServ) builds on the Millennium Ecosystem
Assessment (MA), its sub-global assessments (SGA) and the ongoing MA-follow-up process.
It focuses on addressing some of the MA’s shortcomings as depicted in its evaluation,
particularly through a) a focus on national assessments; b) close involvement of national and
local stakeholders; and c) tools, models and methods for decision makers and policy
implementation to mainstream ecosystem management approaches into development
policies.
ProEcoServ aims at piloting the bundling of ecosystem services and the integration of
ecosystem services approaches in resource management and decision making to promote
innovative solutions that bear potential for scaling-up and replication. The project thus
proposes an umbrella approach, under which five pilot countries re-assess their MA sub-
global assessments and develop site and policy-specific activities and tools for decision
making within a joint programmatic framework.
The overall goal of the project is to better integrate ecosystem assessment, scenario
development and economic valuation of ecosystem services into national sustainable
development planning. The project will lead to developing capacities of decision makers,
users and beneficiaries of ecosystem services to assess trade-offs and development choices
that contribute to strengthened biodiversity and ecosystem resilience, and to develop and
apply appropriate ecosystem management tools within sectoral planning frameworks and
macroeconomic planning models. The project components include:
a) Development and application of multi-scale and locally valid tools and decision
support models in development planning and policy making.
b) Policy implementation support for the application of ecosystem and ecosystem
service management approaches at national and transboundary levels.
c) Strengthening of science-policy interfaces to reinforce multi-scale linkages from local
to international actors, as well as to bridge the gap between research results and
policy application in developing countries and the international biodiversity arena.
Within this overall project approach, each individual country will develop its specific set of
activities that take into account the particularities of the national institutional and policy
framework as well as its ecosystems, e.g. by focusing on a few select regulating ecosystem
services in decline - often strongly affected by the overuse of provisioning ecosystem
services. Through these activities, the project provides an opportunity to generate targeted
national and global benefits at significant levels.
UNEP-DEPI as the implementing agency will ensure the coordination of the overall global
project approach, support the countries in the implementation of the national project
activities, establish a horizontal knowledge exchange among the project partners and
develop and oversee the implementation of a ProEcoServ outreach strategy to particularly
inform the international processes and platforms for biodiversity and ecosystem services.
2
Annex 1: ProEcoServ Project Document
3
Annex 1: ProEcoServ Project Document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ECTION 1: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION.................................................................................... 1
S
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................................. 5
SECTION 2: BACKGROUND AND SITUATION ANALYSIS (BASELINE COURSE OF ACTION)............ 8
2.1. Background and context................................................................................. 8
2.2. Global significance........................................................................................ 14
2.3. Threats, root causes and barrier analysis .................................................. 20
2.4. Institutional, sectoral and policy context.................................................... 25
2.5. Stakeholder mapping and analysis.............................................................. 35
2.6. Baseline analysis and gaps.......................................................................... 47
2.7. Linkages with other GEF and non-GEF interventions................................ 60
SECTION 3: INTERVENTION STRATEGY (ALTERNATIVE)............................................................ 63
3.1. Project rationale, policy conformity and expected
global environmental benefits...................................................................... 64
3.2. Project goal and objective ............................................................................ 65
3.3. Project components and expected results.................................................. 65
3.4. Intervention logic and key assumptions...................................................... 75
3.5. Risk analysis and risk management measures........................................... 76
3.6. Consistency with national priorities or plans............................................. 77
3.7. Incremental cost reasoning........................................................................ 881
3.8. Sustainability.................................................................................................. 84
3.9. Replication...................................................................................................... 86
3.10. Public awareness, communications and mainstreaming strategy........... 86
3.11. Environmental and social safeguards......................................................... 87
SECTION 4: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS................ 88
SECTION 5: STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION........................................................................... 96
SECTION 6: MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN............................................................... 102
SECTION 7: PROJECT FINANCING AND BUDGET.................................................................. 101
7.1. Overall project budget................................................................................. 101
7.2. Project co-financing .................................................................................... 103
7.3. Project cost-effectiveness .......................................................................... 103
APPENDICES .................................................................................................................... 105
Appendix 1: Budget by project components and UNEP budget lines................. 105
Appendix 2: Co-financing by source and UNEP budget lines.............................. 105
Appendix 3: Incremental cost analysis .................................................................. 105
Appendix 4: Results framework.............................................................................. 105
Appendix 5: Workplan and timetable...................................................................... 105
Appendix 6: Key deliverables and benchmarks.................................................... 105
Appendix 7: Costed M&E plan................................................................................. 105
Appendix 8: Summary of reporting requirements and responsibilities.............. 105
Appendix 9: Standard terminal evaluation TOR.................................................... 105
Appendix 10: Decision-making flowchart and organogram................................... 105
Appendix 11: Terms of reference.............................................................................. 105
Appendix 12: Co-financing commitment letters from project partners................. 105
Appendix 13: Endorsement letters of GEF National Focal Points......................... 105
Appendix 14: Draft procurement plan ...................................................................... 105
Appendix 15: Tracking tools...................................................................................... 105
Appendix 16: Additional national data sets on stakeholder engagement
and ecosystem services studies....................................................... 109
4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.
