328x Filetype PDF File size 3.01 MB Source: sites.tufts.edu
CHAPTER 8: GEOLOGIC EVENTS AND TIME
This chapter focuses on determining the relative ages of rock units from field relationships and
how we put together a geologic history or sequence of events. You will also learn how we determine
the numerical ages of rock units.
(Note: Terms in red and italics appear as entries in the companion glossary.)
Since the late 1700’s, geologists have been determining the relative ages of rock formations
based on their relationships with other rock formations and geologic features. Relative ages answer
the simple question of whether one geologic feature (rock formation, fault, erosion surface, etc.) is
older or younger than some other geologic feature. Another type of age is a numerical age, where
the ages of geologic events are expressed as numbers of years before present. Numerical ages for
relatively recent events can sometimes be associated with actual human observations, associations
with known historic events with calendar ages such as a volcanic eruption, or the counting of annual
layers in trees or sediment from the last ~12,000 years. In this case, numerical ages are often known
with certainty and are referred to as absolute ages. However, this does not work for most pre-
historic events. For less than a century, geologists have had numerical dating techniques based on
chemical principles (decay of radioactive isotopes) at their disposal. These techniques provide
numerical age estimates back many millions of years for rock formations such as those in the Fells.
8.1 RELATIVE DATING OF EVENTS
Past geologic processes can be complex, but they can usually be broken down into a sequence of
events that brings some order to them. Using simple outcrop observations, we can usually
determine the relative ages of different rock formations. We apply fundamental principles that were
first established in the 1600’s by Nicholas Steno and late 1700’s by James Hutton, a Scottish
geologist. This essentially marks the beginning of geology as a science, and it greatly changed our
perception of the age of the Earth and the duration of geologic events. If you would like to know
more about James Hutton and the beginnings of geology as a science, there is an excellent three-
part series on the history of geology as a science and the development of fundamental principles
that was made for the BBC. It is called “Men of Rock” (BBC, 2010) and it has three parts, each about
an hour long, that give you the early history and more about the field of geology in Scotland. AND,
they are entertaining!
Although Hutton used all the fundamental principles, they were not widely published or studied
until John Playfair (1802), and later Charles Lyell, summarized Hutton’s work in more available and
easily read books. Lyell’s publications, Principles of Geology (Lyell, 1830, 1832, 1833), are generally
regarded as the first textbooks in geology. These widely circulated publications stated all the
fundamental principles, which we still use today to determine the relative ages of geologic features
and events. The fundamental principles may seem obvious today but in the late 18th century they
were a breakthrough in geologic and scientific thought. They lifted constraints placed on science
and geology by religious doctrines.
8.1.1 Geologic Events
The simplest geologic events are the formation of rock or other geologic units. The formation of
an igneous rock unit refers to the time of magma solidification or crystallization to produce solid
rock. In the case of sedimentary rocks, it is the time when sediment was deposited. This will also be
Chapter 8 - Events and Time 1
the age of the fossils found in a sedimentary rock since they become a part of the rock when
sediment accumulates and buries organisms or their parts to eventually preserve them as fossils.
The age of metamorphic rocks can be trickier because geologists would not only like to know when
metamorphism occurred that changed the rock but also the age of the protolith. These two times
can be greatly different, and in the case of some metamorphic rocks that are metamorphosed
multiple times we may be trying to determine the ages of several events (protolith formation,
metamorphic event 1, metamorphic event 2, etc.).
Several types of events, such as metamorphism, operate on rock formations that have already
been formed. Rocks can also be deformed by tilting of layers, folding, faulting, or fracturing, which
all represent geologic events. Rock units can also be weathered and eroded, and these events
represent times in which rock units were exposed at Earth’s surface. Weathering and erosion can
produce surfaces cut into rocks by removal of weathered material (erosion surfaces); thereby
destroying a part of the geologic record. This boundary represents a time gap in the geologic record
or a break in what is recorded by the rocks, known as an unconformity. Unconformities can also be
the result of a period of non-deposition in a sedimentary rock sequence. Technically, an
unconformityis: a surface that represents a break in time and is overlain by a sedimentary unit,
lava flow, or pyroclastic deposit. Unconformities will be reviewed in more detail below.
To show the relationships between different rock formations and their relative ages, geologists
often look at rock formations in cross section, or side view. This allows you to better see the relative
positions of rock units and the character of their contact relationships. It also provides a better
perspective for determining relative ages. Cross section views can sometimes be seen on
photographs or on drawings that depict field relationships as might be drawn for notes in a field
book. Camera images may be very useful, but many times they do not clearly show the observed
rock types very well and a drawing can better record observations. Symbols for rock types and colors
are used to tell various rock units apart. Figure 8.1 shows some standard symbols that are used in
the Earth and Ocean Sciences Department at Tufts University to indicate various rock types in cross
sections. Using this symbology, it is possible to draw cross section sketches (interpretive diagrams)
that show the basic rock types and relationships seen in the field.
Figure 8.1 – Standard
rock symbols used to
draw geologic cross
sections in the Dept. of Five different
Earth and Ocean symbols used for
Sciences at Tufts intrusive igneous
University. These
symbols are used by rocks
many others, and we
have adopted the
standard forms.
Chapter 8 - Events and Time 2
8.1.2 The Fundamental Principles
In the late 1700’s and early 1800’s, natural scientists, who were the first geologists, formalized the
set of rules, or fundamental principles, that could be applied to the formation of rock units and their
relative ages. The development of the fundamental principles occurred at about the same time as the
formalization of the laws of mathematics, chemistry, and physics that supplanted explanations based
on divine intervention and catastrophism (large supernatural events) that relied on traditional stories
in the Old Testament of the Bible related to Earth’s creation and Noah’s Flood. The fundamental
principles were an outgrowth of advances in scientific reasoning that were applied to rocks, and they
were consistent with observations made on modern processes that form rocks, especially
sedimentary rocks and the rocks formed by volcanic eruptions. It took early geologists longer to
understand intrusive igneous rocks because their formation was not something that they could
observe at Earth’s surface. None of the fundamental principles are rocket science, but the formulation
of these principles back in the late 18th century triggered a revolution in how we perceived the
formation of Earth and its history and age, and it established the science of geology. In addition to
providing a rational explanation of geologic events and their sequence, uniformitarianism gave early
geologists a sense of the vast amount of time in Earth’s history.
The use of observations of modern processes to understand the character of ancient events is
what is called the principle of uniformitarianism. Technically, uniformitarianism says that geologic
events of the past were governed by the same laws of mathematics, chemistry, and physics that
govern processes today. While conditions in the past may have been different, for example, there may
have been less oxygen in the atmosphere, or temperatures may have been different, the laws of
mathematics, chemistry, and physics that operate today are also applicable to ancient Earth systems.
Uniformitarianism is often simplified to a cliché phrase: “the present is the key to the past”. While
there is some truth to this expression in terms of some similarities between modern and ancient
rock-forming processes, the present is never an exact analog for the past because of differing
conditions through geologic time.
In the early formulation of fundamental principles by Nicholas Steno in the 1600’s, sedimentary
rocks got much of the attention. Bedded sedimentary rock units were recognized to have been
deposited as nearly horizontal layers, or beds, like modern sediments, with only a few exceptions.
This is known as the principle original horizontality (Fig. 8.2). Sedimentary layers that we see tilted or
folded today were not deposited in that configuration and therefore must have been tilted or folded
at some later time after their deposition as horizontal layers. Exceptions to this rule are sedimentary
structures called crossbeds (see Fig. 8.3), which are formed on the dipping faces of channel bars in
rivers or sand dunes, and deposits left by mass movement such as landslides and mudflows. Mass
movement deposits, which are not laid down layer upon layer, are frequently poorly sorted without
well-defined bedding and can be chaotic with irregular surfaces.
Figure 8.2 – The principle of original
horizontality says that sedimentary rock
units were laid down as nearly
horizontal layers with a few exceptions
such as crossbeds and some mass
movement deposits. Shown here are
dipping beds of the Chinle Formation
east of the Grand Canyon in Arizona
that were tilted after being deposited
horizontally.
Chapter 8 - Events and Time 3
Sediments and sedimentary rock layers or beds are always deposited on some older surface.
Another way of saying this is that younger sedimentary rock units are superposed on older units.
This is the principle of superposition (Fig.8.3), which is Nicholas Steno’s great contribution. Early
naturalists also came to understand that sedimentary rock units, like modern sedimentary layers, did
not form with abrupt ends where we see them exposed in cliff faces or other outcrops. Instead, they
were once more continuous and today have been truncated by erosion at Earth’s surface. This is the
principle of continuity (Fig. 8.4). Sedimentary rock units are also made of particles that had to form
at some time prior to the deposition of the sediment. They are pieces of other rock formations that
must have been older. For example, if a conglomerate has pebbles made of granite, the pebbles of
granite come from a granite rock formation that is older than the time at which the conglomerate
was deposited. It indicates that there is granite older than the conglomerate. If the granite pebbles
are somewhat unique, it can tell us specifically which granite is older than the conglomerate. This
applies to the sand grains in sandstone, the silt particles in siltstone, and the clay particles in shale.
They are all from eroded rock formations older than the sedimentary rock in which they are found.
This is the principle of derivation – a sedimentary rock unit is younger than the rock units that are
the sources of the particles that make up the sedimentary rock unit (Fig. 8.5)
Figure 8.3 (left) – The principle of superposition says that
sedimentary rock units are always laid down on older rock
units or sediment. A sequence of sedimentary beds or
layers, therefore, is always oldest at the bottom and
youngest at the top. Shown here are horizontal beds of
sandstone, each containing crossbeds, that rest one upon
another with the oldest unit at the bottom and youngest
unit at the top. The rock unit is the Navajo Sandstone in
Zion National Park in Utah. Note the car for scale.
Figure 8.4 (above right) – The principle of continuity states that sedimentary layers found truncated at Earth’s
surface once extended in all directions until they thinned to nothing or reached the edges of their sedimentary
basin. Shown here is the upper 2/3 of the Grand Canyon, which was once composed of horizontal layers that
were more continuous prior to erosion. The same rock units are found on both sides of the canyon.
Chapter 8 - Events and Time 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.