136x Filetype PDF File size 0.12 MB Source: howellkb.uah.edu
11 Higher-Order Equations: Extending First-Order Concepts Let us switch our attention from first-order differential equations to differential equations of order two or higher. Our main interest will be with second-order differential equations, both because it is natural to look at second-order equations after studying first-order equations, and because second-order equations arise in applications much more often than do third-, or fourth- or eighty-third-order equations. Some examples of second-order differential equations are1 y′′ C y D 0 , y′′ C 2xy′ − 5sin.x/y D 30e3x , and .y C1/y′′ D .y′/2 . Still, even higher order differential equations, such as 8y′′′ C 4y′′ C 3y′ − 83y D 2e4x , x3y.iv/ C 6x2y′′ C 3xy′ − 83sin.x/y D 2e4x , and y.83/ C 2y3 y.53/ − x2y′′ D 18 , can arise in applications, at least on occasion. Fortunately, many of the ideas used in solving thesearestraightforwardextensionsofthoseusedtosolvesecond-orderequations. Wewillmake use of this fact extensively in the following chapters. Unfortunately, though, the methods we developed to solve first-order differential equations are of limited direct use in solving higher-order equations. Remember, most of those methods were based on integrating the differential equation after rearranging it into a form that could be legitimately integrated. This rarely is possible with higher-order equations, and that makes solvinghigher-orderequationsmoreofachallenge. Thisdoesnotmeanthatthoseideasdeveloped in previous chapters are useless in solving higher-order equations, only that their use will tend to be subtle rather than obvious. Still, there are higher-order differential equations that, after the application of a simple substitution, can be treated and solved as first-order equations. While our knowledge of first- orderequationsisstillfresh,letusconsidersomeofthemoreimportantsituationsinwhichthisis 1 For notational brevity, we will start using the ‘prime’ notation for derivatives a bit more. It is still recommended, d however, that you use the ‘ / ’ notation when finding solutions just to help keep track of the variables involved. dx 241 242 Higher-Order Equations: Extending First-Order Concepts possible. We will also take a quick look at how the basic ideas regarding first-order initial-value problems extend to higher-order initial-value problems. And finally, to cap off this chapter, we will briefly discuss the higher-order extensions of the existence and uniqueness theorems from section 3.3. 11.1 Treating Some Second-Order Equations as First-Order Suppose we have a second-order differential equation (with y being the yet unknown function and x being the variable). With luck, it is possible to convert the given equation to a first-order differential equation for another function v via the substitution v D y′ . With a little more luck, that first-order equation can then be solved for v using methods discussed in previous chapters, and y can then be obtained from v by solving the first-order differential equation given by the original substitution, y′ D v . This approach requires some luck because, typically, setting v D y′ does not lead to a differential equation for just the one unknown function v. Instead, it usually results in a differential equation with two unknown functions, y and v, along with the variable x . This does not simplify our equation at all! So, being lucky here means that the conversion does yield a differential equation just involving v and one variable. It turnsoutthatwegetluckywithtwotypesofsecond-orderdifferentialequations: thosethat donotexplicitlycontaina y,andthosethatdonotexplicitlycontainan x . Thefirsttypewillbe especially important to us since solving this type of equation is part of an important method for solvingmoregeneraldifferentialequations(the“reductionoforder”methodinchapter13). Itis also, typically, the easier type of equation to solve. So let’s now spend a few moments discussing howtosolvethese equations. (We’ll say more about the second type in a few pages.) Solving Second-Order Differential Equations Not Explicitly Containing y dy d2y If the equation explicitly involves x , / , and / 2 —but not y — then we can naturally dx dx dy view the differential equation as a “first-order equation for / ”. For convenience, we usually dx set dy D v . dx Consequently, d2y D d dy D d v D dv . 2 [ ] dx dx dx dx dx Under these substitutions, the equation becomes a first-order differential equation for v . And since the original equation did not have a y , neither does the differential equation for v . This means we have a reasonable chance of solving this equation for v D v.x/ using methods developed in previous chapters. Then, assuming v.x/ can be so obtained, y.x/ D Z dy dx D Z v.x/dx . dx Treating Some Second-Order Equations as First-Order 243 Whensolving these equations, you normally end up with a formula involving two distinct arbitrary constants: one from the general solution to the first-order differential equation for v , andtheotherarisingfromtheintegrationof v to get y. Don’t forget them, and be sure to label themasdifferent arbitrary constants. ◮ ! Example11.1: Consider the second-order differential equation d2y dy C 2 D 30e3x . dx2 dx Setting dy d2y dv dx D v and dx2 D dx , as suggested above, the differential equation becomes dv C 2v D 30e3x . dx This is a linear first-order differential equation with integrating factor µ D eR2dx D e2x . Proceeding as normal with linear first-order equations, e2xhdv C 2v D 30e3xi dx ֒→ e2x dv C 2e2xv D 30e3xe2x dx ֒→ d e2xv D 30e5x dx ֒→ Z d e2xv dx D Z 30e5x dx dx ֒→ e2xv D 6e5x Cc . 0 Hence, v D e−2x 6e5x Cc0 D 6e3x C c0e−2x . dy But v D / ,sothelastequationcanberewrittenas dx dy D 6e3x C c e−2x , dx 0 which is easily integrated, Z 3x −2x 3x c0 −2x y D 6e Cc0e dx D 2e − 2e C c2 . c 0 Thus(letting c D − / ), the solution to our original differential equation is 1 2 y.x/ D 2e3x − c1e−2x C c2 . 244 Higher-Order Equations: Extending First-Order Concepts If your differential equation for v is separable and you are solving as such, don’t forget to check for the constant solutions to this differential equation, and to take these “constant-v” solutions into account when integrating y′ D v . ◮ ! Example11.2: Consider the second-order differential equation d2y D −dy −32 . (11.1) dx2 dx Letting dy d2y dv dx D v and dx2 D dx , the differential equation becomes dv D .v−3/2 . (11.2) dx This equation has a constant solution, v D 3 , which we can rewrite as dy D 3 . dx Integrating then gives us y.x/ D 3x C c0 . This describes all the “constant-v” solutions to our original differential equation. To find the nonconstant solutions to equation (11.2), divide through by .v − 3/2 and integrate: dv D .v−3/2 dx ֒→ .v −3/−2 dv D −1 dx ֒→ Z v−3−2dvdx D −Z 1dx . / dx ֒→ −.v−3/−1 D −x Cc1 ֒→ v D 3 C 1 . x −c1 But, since v D y′ , this last equation is the same as dy D 3 C 1 , dx x −c1 which is easily integrated, yielding y.x/ D 3x C ln|x −c1| C c2 . Gathering all the solutions we’ve found gives us the set consisting of y D 3x C ln|x −c1| C c2 and y.x/ D 3x C c0 (11.3) describing all possible solutions to our original differential equation.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.