234x Filetype PDF File size 0.92 MB Source: enrd.ec.europa.eu
The impact of LEADER on balanced
territorial development, 2014-2020
Janet Dwyer and Katarina Kubinakova, ccri@glos.ac.uk
10th meeting, Sub-group on LEADER and Community-Led Local Development
February 2022
1
Evaluation Methodology
All online - Covid
14 Evaluation Study Questions on the effectiveness, efficiency,
relevance, coherence and EU value-added of LEADER
Document and literature review, Case studies
EU-level data and indicator analysis • 36 LAGs, from 14 RDPs in 10
contrasting Member States
Online Surveys 285 Interviews:
• Managing Authorities (56, in 27 MS- • LEADER personnel + beneficiaries
no response from Finland) • local + regional stakeholders
• LAGs (511 complete, in all 28 MS- • EU experts
about 800 replied in total) • Validation workshops at draft report
stage, in each Case Study
Data analysis
• Comparing MA & LAG surveys
• Comparing Case Studies with survey
between MS, factors and outcomes
Validation webinar with EC
2
Case study
LAGs
Materials collected:
Interviews
• LAG managers
• MA (& PA if needed)
• 3-5 Beneficiaries per LAG
• LAG member / other
stakeholder, per case
DATA / factual information
• RDP documents
• Standard indicators
• Evaluations (& self-
evaluations)
• Scientific studies
3
LEADER -extent
LAG budgetary spending to 2020 and 2021, EC data LAG coverage of rural population (Source: AIRs 2020)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
AT BE BG CY CZ DEDK EE ES FI FR GRHRHU IE IT LT LU LV MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK UK
EUR 7.01 Billion planned, 2014-2020 (7% EAFRD) 2,784 LEADER LAGs in the EU-28
Uptake accelerated (ave 49%, by Sept ‘21) Cover a significant share of EU rural population –
Expenditure Sept 2021 includes transition (2014-22), set more than half, in 23 countries
against 2020 budget Mostly 2019 data (AIRs 2020), some 2018 (AIRs 2019)
4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.