494x Filetype PDF File size 1.06 MB Source: linguistics.ucla.edu
Introduction to Linguistics
MarcusKracht
Department of Linguistics, UCLA
3125CampbellHall
450Hilgard Avenue
LosAngeles, CA 90095–1543
kracht@humnet.ucla.edu
2 Contents
Contents
Lecture 1: Introduction ................................................. 3
Lecture 2: Phonetics...................................................12
Lecture 3: Phonology I.................................................24
Lecture 4: Phonology II................................................41
Lecture 5: Phonology III...............................................55
Lecture 6: Phonology IV...............................................66
Lecture 7: Morphology I...............................................79
Lecture 8: Syntax I .................................................... 86
Lecture 9: Syntax II ................................................... 98
Lecture 10: Syntax III ................................................ 109
Lecture 11: Syntax IV ................................................ 119
Lecture 12: Syntax V ................................................. 134
Lecture 13: Morphology II............................................144
Lecture 14: Semantics I...............................................154
Lecture 15: Semantics II..............................................160
Lecture 16: Semantics III.............................................168
Lecture 17: Semantics IV ............................................. 177
Lecture 18: Semantics V..............................................186
Lecture 19: Language Families and History of Languages .............. 194
Lecture 1: Introduction
Languages are sets of signs. Signs combine an exponent (a sequence
of letters or sounds) with a meaning. Grammars are ways to generate
signs from more basic signs. Signs combine a form and a meaning,
andtheyareidenticalwithneithertheirexponentnorwiththeirmean-
ing.
Before we start. I have tried to be as explicit as I could in preparing these notes.
You will find that some of the technicalities are demanding at first sight. Do
not panic! You are not expected to master these technicalities right away. The
technical character is basically due to my desire to be as explicit and detailed as
possible. For some of you this might actually be helpful. If you are not among
themyoumaywanttoreadsomeotherbookontheside(whichIencourageyouto
doanyway). However,linguisticsisgettingincreasinglyformalandmathematical,
and you are well advised to get used to this style of doing science. So, if you do
not understand right away what I am saying, you will simply have to go over it
again and again. And keep asking questions! New words and technical terms
that are used for the first time are typed in bold-face. If you are supposed to
know what they mean, a definition will be given right away. The definition is
valid throughout the entire course, but be aware of the fact that other people might
define things differently. This applies when you read other books, for example.
Youshould beware of possible discrepancies in terminology. If you are not given
a definition elsewhere, be cautious. If you are given a different definition it does
not mean that the other books get it wrong. The symbol in the margin signals
some material that is difficult, and optional. Such passages are put in for those
whowanttogetaperfect understanding of the material; but they are not requried
knowledge.
(End of note)
Language is a means to communicate, it is a semiotic system. By that we
simply mean that it is a set of signs. Its A sign is a pair consisting—in the words
of Ferdinand de Saussure—of a signifier and a signified. We prefer to call the
signifier the exponent and the signified the meaning. For example, in English the
string /dog/ is a signifier, and its signified is, say, doghood, or the set of all dogs.
(I use the slashes to enclose concrete signifiers, in this case sequences of letters.)
Sign systems are ubiquitous: clocks, road signs, pictograms—they all are parts of
4 Lecture 1: Introduction
sign systems. Language differs from them only in its complexity. This explains
why language signs have much more internal structure than ordinary signs. For
notice that language allows to express virtually every thought that we have, and
the number of signs that we can produce is literally endless. Although one may
find it debatable whether or not language is actually infinite, it is clear that we
are able to understand utterances that we have never heard before. Every year,
hundreds of thousands of books appear, and clearly each of them is new. If it
were the same as a previously published book this would be considered a breach
of copyright! However, no native speaker of the language experiences trouble
understanding them (apart from technical books).
It might be far fetched, though, to speak of an entire book as a sign. But
nothing speaks against that. Linguists mostly study only signs that consist of just
one sentence. And this is what we shall do here, too. However, texts are certainly
more than a sequence of sentences, and the study of discourse (which includes
texts and dialogs) is certainly a very vital one. Unfortunately, even sentences are
so complicated that it will take all our time to study them. The methods, however,
shall be useful for discourse analysis as well.
In linguistics, language signs are constituted of four different levels, not just
two: phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics. Semantics deals with
the meanings (what is signified), while the other three are all concerned with the
exponent. At the lowest level we find that everything is composed from a small
set of sounds, or—when we write—of letters. (Chinese is exceptional in that the
alphabet consists of around 50,000 ‘letters’, but each sign stands for a syllable—a
sequence of sounds, not just a single one.) With some exceptions (for example
tone and intonation) every utterance can be seen as a sequence of sounds. For
example, /dog/ consists of three letters (and three sounds): /d/, /o/ and /g/. In
order not to confuse sounds (and sound sequences) with letters we denote the
sounds by enclosing them in square brackets. So, the sounds that make up [dog]
are [d], [o] and [g], in that order. What is important to note here is that sounds
by themselves in general have no meaning. The decomposition into sounds has
no counterpart in the semantics. Just as every signifier can be decomposed into
sounds, it can also be decomposed into words. In written language we can spot the
words by looking for minimal parts of texts enclosed by blanks (or punctuation
marks). In spoken language the definition of word becomes very tricky. The
part of linguistics that deals with how words are put together into sentences is
called syntax. On the other hand, words are not the smallest meaningful units of
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.